guide:submission_rot
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| guide:submission_rot [2016/02/12 11:00] – Page moved from submission_rot to guide:submission_rot wes | guide:submission_rot [2020/12/23 12:53] (current) – removed wes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ======Submission Rot====== | ||
| - | ==== Type 1 ==== | ||
| - | |||
| - | When a reviewer sees a submission that is beyond their immediate field of technical expertise or understanding, | ||
| - | |||
| - | However, when a technology falls between or beyond the immediate fields of technical expertise of the entire reviewer collective, the submission is often left idle for very long periods of time and is forgotten until bumped. Even after bumps, such submissions are usually left to rot longer. | ||
| - | |||
| - | This tends to happen with more scientifically advanced-sounding submissions. Tech staff will sometimes reply to these submissions with minor suggestions, | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ==== Type 2 ==== | ||
| - | Submissions that could drastically alter the roleplay, and are therefore controversial, | ||
| - | |||
| - | It used to be these submissions were collectively ignored whether they were controversial or not. Commonly they were race-related submissions of technology, such as a weapon for a certain race. The Submissions Office now handles these, so Type 2 is less frequently seen. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ==== Type 3 ==== | ||
| - | Submissions that are so huge or numerous (subsystems, | ||