STAR ARMY

Sci-fi roleplaying and worldbuilding community

User Tools

Site Tools


faction:yamatai:senate:proposal_116-a

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
faction:yamatai:senate:proposal_116-a [2022/09/23 05:25] – tiny change yuukifaction:yamatai:senate:proposal_116-a [2022/09/26 11:51] – [Title II] yuuki
Line 63: Line 63:
       - In no instance will the creation of a limited fork for evidentiary purposes be made in violation of any other law or statute.       - In no instance will the creation of a limited fork for evidentiary purposes be made in violation of any other law or statute.
       - In no instance will the limited fork be manifest as other than a pure infomorph       - In no instance will the limited fork be manifest as other than a pure infomorph
-      - An individual replaced by a fork, legally or otherwise, may choose to have their archives stored in a sub-viable format such as permitted for evidentiary purposes in Article 6, section d., subsection I. of this Act.+      - An individual replaced by a fork, legally or otherwise, may choose to have their archives stored in a sub-viable format such as permitted for evidentiary purposes as defined in this Act.
         - Forked individuals who have edited memories of criminal acts or actions creating a civil liability committed prior to forking are still liable for those acts or actions.         - Forked individuals who have edited memories of criminal acts or actions creating a civil liability committed prior to forking are still liable for those acts or actions.
           - An individual voluntarily undergoing a forking procedure without disclosing any of the above shall be considered evidence tampering, and in instances of editing memories of criminal activity, it shall also be considered an additional offense of the same severity.             - An individual voluntarily undergoing a forking procedure without disclosing any of the above shall be considered evidence tampering, and in instances of editing memories of criminal activity, it shall also be considered an additional offense of the same severity.  
Line 69: Line 69:
     - An individual undergoing any forking process may maintain an archival copy of the pre-forked state, and this is an exception to any duty by any party to make a good-faith effort to keep all backups synchronized.     - An individual undergoing any forking process may maintain an archival copy of the pre-forked state, and this is an exception to any duty by any party to make a good-faith effort to keep all backups synchronized.
     - None of the sections in this article are applicable to the creation or birth of Nekovalkyrja with skills, personality, or other elements inherited from the mother Nekovalkyrja or a Nekovalkyrja template, or any similar process enacted by otherwise authorized individuals.     - None of the sections in this article are applicable to the creation or birth of Nekovalkyrja with skills, personality, or other elements inherited from the mother Nekovalkyrja or a Nekovalkyrja template, or any similar process enacted by otherwise authorized individuals.
-    - None of the sections in this article are applicable in the instance of a single individual simultaneously manifest in physically distinct bodies and in control of both, as only a single individual in considered extant.+    - None of the sections in this article are applicable in the instance of a single individual simultaneously manifest in physically distinct bodies and in control of both, as only a single individual is considered extant.
     - No article or section of this act applies to the creation of Nekovalkyrja templates or Sprites, or other comparable creations, by otherwise authorized entities.     - No article or section of this act applies to the creation of Nekovalkyrja templates or Sprites, or other comparable creations, by otherwise authorized entities.
     - Non-negligent accident or being the victim of deliberate misinformation that would be accepted by a reasonable individual is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this article.     - Non-negligent accident or being the victim of deliberate misinformation that would be accepted by a reasonable individual is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this article.

faction/yamatai/senate/proposal_116-a.txt · Last modified: 2023/12/21 04:25 (external edit)