This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
faction:yamatai:senate:proposal_116-a [2022/09/10 13:25] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation wes | faction:yamatai:senate:proposal_116-a [2022/09/26 11:51] – [Title II] yuuki | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
- Making a judicially-authorized manifestation of a limited fork as an informorph used for evidentiary purposes. | - Making a judicially-authorized manifestation of a limited fork as an informorph used for evidentiary purposes. | ||
- In such an instance, only the minimal set of memories material to the case will be authorized for inclusion in the fork– the creation of a full individual is not permitted for evidentiary purposes. | - In such an instance, only the minimal set of memories material to the case will be authorized for inclusion in the fork– the creation of a full individual is not permitted for evidentiary purposes. | ||
+ | - In no instance will the creation of a limited fork for evidentiary purposes be made in violation of any other law or statute. | ||
- In no instance will the limited fork be manifest as other than a pure infomorph | - In no instance will the limited fork be manifest as other than a pure infomorph | ||
- | - An individual replaced by a fork, legally or otherwise, may choose to have their archives stored in a sub-viable format such as permitted for evidentiary purposes in Article 6, section d., subsection I. of this Act. | + | - An individual replaced by a fork, legally or otherwise, may choose to have their archives stored in a sub-viable format such as permitted for evidentiary purposes |
- Forked individuals who have edited memories of criminal acts or actions creating a civil liability committed prior to forking are still liable for those acts or actions. | - Forked individuals who have edited memories of criminal acts or actions creating a civil liability committed prior to forking are still liable for those acts or actions. | ||
- An individual voluntarily undergoing a forking procedure without disclosing any of the above shall be considered evidence tampering, and in instances of editing memories of criminal activity, it shall also be considered an additional offense of the same severity. | - An individual voluntarily undergoing a forking procedure without disclosing any of the above shall be considered evidence tampering, and in instances of editing memories of criminal activity, it shall also be considered an additional offense of the same severity. | ||
Line 68: | Line 69: | ||
- An individual undergoing any forking process may maintain an archival copy of the pre-forked state, and this is an exception to any duty by any party to make a good-faith effort to keep all backups synchronized. | - An individual undergoing any forking process may maintain an archival copy of the pre-forked state, and this is an exception to any duty by any party to make a good-faith effort to keep all backups synchronized. | ||
- None of the sections in this article are applicable to the creation or birth of Nekovalkyrja with skills, personality, | - None of the sections in this article are applicable to the creation or birth of Nekovalkyrja with skills, personality, | ||
- | - None of the sections in this article are applicable in the instance of a single individual simultaneously manifest in physically distinct bodies and in control of both, as only a single individual | + | - None of the sections in this article are applicable in the instance of a single individual simultaneously manifest in physically distinct bodies and in control of both, as only a single individual |
- No article or section of this act applies to the creation of Nekovalkyrja templates or Sprites, or other comparable creations, by otherwise authorized entities. | - No article or section of this act applies to the creation of Nekovalkyrja templates or Sprites, or other comparable creations, by otherwise authorized entities. | ||
- Non-negligent accident or being the victim of deliberate misinformation that would be accepted by a reasonable individual is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this article. | - Non-negligent accident or being the victim of deliberate misinformation that would be accepted by a reasonable individual is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this article. |