faction:yamatai:senate:proposal_116-a
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| faction:yamatai:senate:proposal_116-a [2022/09/10 13:25] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation wes | faction:yamatai:senate:proposal_116-a [2022/09/26 11:49] – [Title II] yuuki | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| - Making a judicially-authorized manifestation of a limited fork as an informorph used for evidentiary purposes. | - Making a judicially-authorized manifestation of a limited fork as an informorph used for evidentiary purposes. | ||
| - In such an instance, only the minimal set of memories material to the case will be authorized for inclusion in the fork– the creation of a full individual is not permitted for evidentiary purposes. | - In such an instance, only the minimal set of memories material to the case will be authorized for inclusion in the fork– the creation of a full individual is not permitted for evidentiary purposes. | ||
| + | - In no instance will the creation of a limited fork for evidentiary purposes be made in violation of any other law or statute. | ||
| - In no instance will the limited fork be manifest as other than a pure infomorph | - In no instance will the limited fork be manifest as other than a pure infomorph | ||
| - An individual replaced by a fork, legally or otherwise, may choose to have their archives stored in a sub-viable format such as permitted for evidentiary purposes in Article 6, section d., subsection I. of this Act. | - An individual replaced by a fork, legally or otherwise, may choose to have their archives stored in a sub-viable format such as permitted for evidentiary purposes in Article 6, section d., subsection I. of this Act. | ||
| Line 68: | Line 69: | ||
| - An individual undergoing any forking process may maintain an archival copy of the pre-forked state, and this is an exception to any duty by any party to make a good-faith effort to keep all backups synchronized. | - An individual undergoing any forking process may maintain an archival copy of the pre-forked state, and this is an exception to any duty by any party to make a good-faith effort to keep all backups synchronized. | ||
| - None of the sections in this article are applicable to the creation or birth of Nekovalkyrja with skills, personality, | - None of the sections in this article are applicable to the creation or birth of Nekovalkyrja with skills, personality, | ||
| - | - None of the sections in this article are applicable in the instance of a single individual simultaneously manifest in physically distinct bodies and in control of both, as only a single individual | + | - None of the sections in this article are applicable in the instance of a single individual simultaneously manifest in physically distinct bodies and in control of both, as only a single individual |
| - No article or section of this act applies to the creation of Nekovalkyrja templates or Sprites, or other comparable creations, by otherwise authorized entities. | - No article or section of this act applies to the creation of Nekovalkyrja templates or Sprites, or other comparable creations, by otherwise authorized entities. | ||
| - Non-negligent accident or being the victim of deliberate misinformation that would be accepted by a reasonable individual is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this article. | - Non-negligent accident or being the victim of deliberate misinformation that would be accepted by a reasonable individual is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this article. | ||
faction/yamatai/senate/proposal_116-a.txt · Last modified: 2023/12/21 04:25 by 127.0.0.1