STAR ARMY

Sci-fi roleplaying and worldbuilding community

User Tools

Site Tools


faction:4th_elysian_celestial_empire:opencyclereactor

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revisionBoth sides next revision
faction:4th_elysian_celestial_empire:opencyclereactor [2017/05/27 14:20] – created wazufaction:4th_elysian_celestial_empire:opencyclereactor [2017/06/16 15:50] – [About] wazu
Line 11: Line 11:
 The Open-Cycle name comes from the reactor being directly exposed to space, compared to closed-cycle reactors that are entirely self-contained inside of containers / ships / structures.  The Open-Cycle name comes from the reactor being directly exposed to space, compared to closed-cycle reactors that are entirely self-contained inside of containers / ships / structures. 
  
-The design itself comes from the [[faction:4th_elysian_celestial_empire]]'s desire for grand constructions projects. While fully enclosed reactors are much more efficent, and far more suitable for power armors, starships, ect, the Open-Cycle design allowed the empire to more quickly build the massive reactors needed to power their facilities and warships.+The design itself comes from the [[faction:4th_elysian_celestial_empire]]'s desire for [[faction:4th_elysian_celestial_empire:cwstarbase|grand constructions projects]]. While fully enclosed reactors are much more efficent, and far more suitable for power armors, starships, ect, the Open-Cycle design allowed the empire to more quickly build the massive reactors needed to power their facilities and warships.
  
 ===== Design ===== ===== Design =====